Questions of the Universe: that word doesn’t mean what you think it means
Posted by: Carrie in Questions of the UniverseEnglish is an interesting language and not only that, it’s constantly evovling, which adds to it’s interesting-ness (however making things a tad more confusing). Words aren’t the same as they used to be, they change drastically responding fluidly to modern connotation. Such evolution and changes are barely noticed by the average speaker, it’s far too subtle for that. I’m not referring to slang here, that’s a whole other kettle of fish, yo. Okay, I guess I’m talking a little bit about slang, but not in the Snoop-Dogg-adds-”izzle’s” kind of way, but modern adapations of things kind of way.
I shall now highlight some examples to clarify what the heck I’m going on about.
Retarded
Today, this is a pejorative term for mentally handicapped individuals, though, at one time the politically correct one, imagine that. More commonly though, it’s used to reference how someone of “normal” mental faculties are acting like said mentally handicapped individuals.
Actually “retarded” isn’t a medical term in the slightest, not even in a layman’s world. It means:
to make slow; delay the development or progress of (anaction, process, etc.); hinder or impede.
Someone who is mentally handicapped might actually be so due to retarded development in their brain. Hence…
Though no one uses it like this anymore. I guess it carries too much controversy.
Layman
(since it’s come up already, might as well dive in)
These days we use this when advising someone smarter than ourselves to talk slower and use smaller words. AKA “In layman’s terms.”
Now meaning someone not part of a given profession, the word has it’s origins in the church. A “layman” refers to:
a person who is not a member of the clergy; one of the laity.
So most basically, someone who isn’t a priest. Commonly, this was someone who would often participate in the liturgy, but didn’t have the special privileges awarded to one who is ordained. Someone from the congregation, perhaps. They could serve communion but not bless the bread and wine.
Grotesque
Ew. Yucky. Disgusting. Strange. Vulgar. Usually said by pretentious people. Or those who want to sound more intelligent.
In actuality, being “grotesque” has nothing to do with being “gross,” to which it seems to be interchangeable.
Originally it referred to a particular style of exaggerated Roman art, but perhaps we don’t have to quite that far on this definition. The word is still fairly common in the arts world, such as theatre or visual art. “Grotesque” is intended to inspire a feeling of the bizarre. Highly exaggerated figures and characters might evoke this feeling. Possibly defined as:
— adj 1. strangely or fantastically distorted; bizarre: a grotesquereflection in the mirror 2. of or characteristic of the grotesque in art 3. absurdly incongruous; in a ludicrous context: a grotesque turnof phrase
I can think of many other words like, but I think you get the point for now.
I guess I don’t really have any analysis of the above terms. I just think it’s a cool thing that has happened. And something largely taken for granted.
Tata for now, gentle readers
Entries (RSS)